Apes Have Mid Life Crisis Too
From Nature…
A study of 508 great apes in captivity shows that the animalsÛª sense of well-being bottoms out in their late 20s to mid-30s, the ape equivalent of middle age, before rebounding in old age.
The finding that mid-life crises may not be uniquely human suggests that the events might have a biological, rather than a sociological, cause.
Men and women worldwide, regardless of their wealth or status, experience a dip in happiness at middle-age. Social scientists have struggled to identify the underlying cause of the dissatisfaction. Social and economic factors, such as financial hardship and the failure to realize unrealistic ambitions, are possible causes.
Alexander Weiss, a psychologist at the University of Edinburgh, UK, and his team set out to see if there might be a biological factor involved in the crises. They sought to assess the well-being of captive chimpanzees and orangutans as judged by their keepers or those who knew them well.
The apes covered all age ranges, and their Û÷happinessÛª was rated through a survey answered by their keepers. The survey covered four criteria: the animalsÛª overall mood; how much pleasure they got out of socializing; their success in achieving goals such as obtaining food and objects they desire; and how happy the keeper would be if he or she were that animal for a week.
Among three different groups of chimps and orangutans surveyed, the happiest tended to be the oldest and youngest, and the most dissatisfied tended to be in their 30s. The study, however, is a snapshot ÛÓ it didn’t follow any of the apes over time ÛÓ which means there could be confounding factors such as the early death of unhappy apes.åÊ
ÛÏMaybe evolution needed us to be at our most dissatisfied in midlife,Û says co-author Andrew Oswald, who is based at the University of Warwick, UK. Unhappiness can be a catalyst for change, potentially spurring unhappy adults to act more adaptively, for instance, by seeking out mates.
ÛÏI donÛªt think youÛªll find chimpanzees buying bright red shiny cars,Û Weiss says. So darn, maybe that red convertible Lexus I bought ins 2010 is my mid-life crisis after all. I do recall beating my chest proudly before driving off the lot with it!
How the Healthcare Law Will Impact You
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), often referred to as “Obamacare,” provides for a sweeping overhaul of the United States’ healthcare system. Although the PPACA constitutes one of the most controversial pieces of legislation enacted in decades, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law in mid-2012.åÊ Therefore, like it or not, all Americans should become informed about the PPACA and the impact in will have on our daily lives. Here are highlights of some of the most significant changes that the law will introduce to the healthcare industry. Preexisting Conditions. Traditionally, health insurance companies have regulated who they insure by implementing standards that make certain applicants ineligible for coverage. For example, applicants suffering from serious health conditions might be denied coverage from multiple companies, thus essentially rendering them uninsurable. Drawing support from both sides of the debate, the PPACA addresses that issue head-on by prohibiting insurance companies from denying applicants for preexisting conditions like chronic illnesses or diseases. It also forbids insurers from dropping existing policies because of a particular health condition. Individual Mandate. Advocates of the PPACA argue that if we eliminate an insurance company’s right to deny coverage because of a preexisting condition, then the law necessarily has to require all citizens to obtain insurance. Otherwise, people would forgo insurance coverage until they developed a condition that required medical treatment, at which point they could obtain an insurance policy. In fact, if that scenario played out, it would likely cripple the insurance industry, as insurers would only receive premiums from individuals suffering from serious illnesses. Therefore, to prevent what many believe would be a catastrophic meltdown of the healthcare industry, the PPACA will require every individual in the United States to obtain a health insurance policy by 2014. As a result, people who currently have no health insurance coverage because they cannot afford it may be compelled to purchase a policy or pay a fine ̱ not without support, however, as the PPACA also addresses how to make healthcare affordable for low income individuals and their families. For those who already have health insurance, the impact of the individual mandate will likely take the form of at least somewhat higher taxes. Employer Mandate. Under one of the most controversial provisions of the PPACA, companies employing over 50 people will be forced to offer employees some type of health insurance option. If they refuse, employers must pay various penalties. Smaller companies, or those with fewer than 50 full-time employees, are not required to offer insurance but will receive tax-break incentives if they choose to. Opponents of the new law argue that employers will get around the mandate by slashing workers’ hours to lower the number of “full-time” employees they have on staff, thus reducing an employees’ income. Expanding Rights for Dependents. Prior to the enactment of the PPACA, individual insurance companies could determine the maximum age children could remain on their parents’ insurance policies. Under the new law, however, insurers must permit policyholders to keep children on their insurance plans until they reach 26 years old. That is true regardless of whether the child is single, married, in school, working, etc. Ending Lifetime Caps. Before the PPACA, employers typically put a limit on the amount of money they would pay toward an individual’s healthcare costs over the person’s lifetime. Congress made that policy illegal; now, an insurance company cannot refuse to pay for one’s healthcare costs because of the amount paid on the person’s behalf over time. Quality of Care. The jury is still out on how the new healthcare law will impact the quality of care provided by our nation’s doctors, nurses, and other healthcare providers. Advocates of the PPACA predict that mandating insurance coverage will result in doctors getting paid more reliably and not having to treat uninsured patients for free. Therefore, they argue that the PPACA will not detract from the financial incentive that sometimes attracts talented young people to the medical profession. Opponents of Obamacare disagree. They argue that the increase in bureaucracy and expanded government involvement in the healthcare industry will create more costs for doctors and patients alike, detract from the physician-patient relationship, and generally stifle innovation in the industry. Only time will tell how that all plays out. In reality, the PPACA will impact different people in different ways depending on their age, their health, their income, as well as other factors. Nevertheless, arming yourself with knowledge early on will help you take advantage of the aspects of the new law that benefit you and plan ahead for the parts that might not be as appealing. What do you think? Are you or someone you know a healthcare professional in some capacity with a strong opinion one way or another? John Egan is managing editor of the website insurancequotes.com, which assists consumers in increasing their knowledge about auto insurance, as well as health and life insurance.
Botox Approved for Overactive Bladder Treatment (VIDEO)
[embed_youtube”420″ height=”315″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/hbmzFEWmimQ”]
What Would Jack Bauer Do?
In the now-infamous case of an independent living facilityÛªs policy on CPR, the simple perception is that a woman was dying and needed CPR. Sound and prudent judgment would have been to perform it, or move out of the way and get someone else to do it.
I invite you to read my blog on McKnightÛªs about my thoughts.
After writing I added the following comment.
First when ÛÏshoppingÛ for a care facility it is important to ask the right questions such as knowing the pertinent policies and staff capabilities. Second, it is important to spell out in advance directives how you would like to be cared for should something happen and have a proxy speak for you if you canÛªt. In this womanÛªs case she did not have a DNR so in most instances people would step in and try to help. It is interesting that this womanÛªs daughter agrees with the facilityÛªs actions. Other professionals are saying that CPR would not have helped and going to heroic measures is not always necessary or helpful.
Regardless, this is more of a human compassion issue. What if this were outside any type of senior or medical facility say a restaurant? If someone collapses I am going to try to help. I am not going to stop and see if they want to be helped. One commenter on the blog mentioned the liability issue and of course you canÛªt help but have that in your mind. Many states have Good Samaritan laws that protect people should they intervene. To me it still comes back to doing the right thing.
What do you think?
Botox Approved for Overactive Bladder Treatment
The word is leaking out. Botox may soon be a treatment of choice for urinary incontinence.(Sorry!)
The Food and Drug Administration recently approved onabotulinumtoxinA, manufactured under the name Botox by Allergan Inc., as a treatment for overactive bladder, following two clinical trials involving more than 1,100 patients.
Study participants whose bladder muscles received Botox injections showed between 1.6 and 1.9 times fewer episodes of urinary incontinence daily compared with those who received a placebo injection, according to the FDA. Botox recipients also had less frequent urges to urinate and produced more urine than people who received a placebo. The treatment works by relaxing the bladder muscle, thereby increasing the bladder’s storage capacity.
ÛÏClinical studies have demonstrated Botox’s ability to significantly reduce the frequency of urinary incontinence,Û said Hylton V. Joffe, M.D., director of the Division of Reproductive and Urologic Products in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. ÛÏToday’s approval provides an important additional treatment option for patients with overactive bladder, a condition that affects an estimated 33 million men and women in the United States.Û
Check with your doc!